Asset Ratings
Machine-readable minimum standards for the cross-chain infrastructure you build on, scored from a public methodology and watched for drift.
Six weighted dimensions
The score is 0–10000 basis points across six dimensions, and the weights are published so a rating can be argued with rather than believed. Analyst-attested facts are minority-weighted and marked as such.
- Verification security · 30%
- Mint controls · 20%
- Upgradeability & timelocks · 20%
- Proof-of-backing · 15%
- Transparency · 10%
- Track record · 5%
Five floor levels
F2 is the recommended gate for collateral onboarding. F0 is a do-not-integrate warning, and it is a floor rather than a score because integration is a binary decision.
- F0, fails minimum, do not integrate
- F1, minimum
- F2, standard, the recommended collateral gate
- F3, strong
- F4, exemplary
Fatal criteria
Some configurations cap the floor regardless of how the other dimensions score. A 1-of-1 verifier is the canonical one: it is what released 116,500 rsETH against a burn that never happened, and no amount of transparency or track record compensates for it.
Drift monitoring
The rating is not an annual review. Ops Monitor configuration watchers feed Asset Ratings continuously, so the day a dependency falls below the level you accepted it at is an alert rather than a finding at your next audit.
Where the boundary sits.
In the same type as everything above it, and paired with the control that covers it. This is the part your auditor reads first.
Put Asset Ratings on your perimeter.
Engine-level detail and the full catalogue are provisioned with your engagement, alongside the console your team works in.